- Fingerprints
have been used for identification purposes for over 2000 years.
- Charles
Darwin's cousin brought fingerprints to Scotland Yard.
- Identical
twins have the same fingerprints.
- Pygmies
have approximately twice as many whorl type fingerprints than
most other population sub-groups.
- You cannot
change your fingerprints.
- Your fingerprints
do not predict your future.
- Your feet
have 'fingerprints' too.
- Different
diseases have their unique fingerprint profiles.
- I lost
a finger. I can still get a LifePrints Life Purpose Analysis.
- The FBI
can determine your physical characteristics (sex, height, weight)
from your fingerprints.
Answers
- True. Chinese
potters, over 2000 years ago, put their thumb print on jars,
vases, and casks to establish ownership.
- True. Sir
Francis Galton, Charles Darwin's cousin, established the scientific
validity of fingerprint comparison in 1893. He proved that fingerprints
were unique, unalterable, and easily classifiable, opening the
door for use by police departments all over the world.
- False.
Maternal (identical, or same egg) twins have similar but not
the same fingerprints. As a matter of fact, comparative fingerprint
similarity was established in the 1970's to help differentiate
same egg twins from separate egg (fraternal) twins. A mathematical
formula was created (a coefficient of similarity) that showed
a .5 response for same egg twins, .3 for separate egg twins
(or any brother, sister comparison) and .1 for any two people
at random. Apparently, children of the same parents have significant
similarity to each others' fingerprints, but not as much as
maternal twins. This information could be important for kidney
transplants, etc.
- True. Different
population sub-groups have different percentages of the different
fingerprint types. Whereas white, European populations average
25% whorl patterns, the pygmy population has 50% whorls. Early
20th century researchers used this fact to make a case for pygmy
inferiority. Since some great apes (they have fingerprints too)
show a 50% whorl count, pygmies were said to be backward, more
similar to apes, genetically inferior. Many of the early research
papers on fingerprints show similar racial and ethnic biases.
Interestingly, in the LifePrints system, high numbers of whorls
tend to indicate a deeply imbedded Service orientation.
- True.
- Genetics
influences fingerprints and genetics is destiny, at least to
some degree. If you are male, 5'10", you will probably
never be the center for your favorite professional basketball
team. However, although your fingerprints do not reveal your
future, they do reveal your highest potentials. Making it happen
is up to you.
- True. both
the hand and foot surfaces, not just the fingertips, contain
dermatoglyphic (fingerprint type) markings.
- True. Doctors
and other scientists are studying fingerprints to help diagnose
disease early on. They have discovered that different fingerprint
profiles are associated with different physical and behavioral
conditions. This study is called dermatoglyphics (derma=skin,
glyphics=carvings: skin carvings), a name coined by Dr. Harold
Cummins, Univ. of Oklahoma, the father of fingerprint analysis.
- Yes. Seeing
the other nine fingerprints will give your fingerprint analyst
an excellent chance to decode your Life Purpose.
- False.
They have tried. However, the FBI has been unsuccessful at decoding
physical characteristics from a set or individual fingerprint.
You can imagine why this would be of interest to law enforcement.
If they could lift a fingerprint from the murder weapon and,
without a witness, issue an accurate all points bulletin, what
an asset that would be. So far, no go. Other traits, such as
leadership, creativity, communication skills of different types,
etc. do correlate with certain combinations of fingerprint patterns.
|
|